The Innate Central Nervous System Immune Response to
an Experimental Immune Challenge in People with
Fibromyalgia
Principal Investigator: Jarred Younger,
Ph.D.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
(January 2020)
“The key for understanding fibromyalgia is the concept
of sensitized or ‘primed’ microglia (the brain’s immune
cells), which are operating on a hair-trigger,” says
Younger. “Primed microglia react with full force to
events that would not normally activate them. If the
microglia in individuals with fibro are primed, a tiny
trigger may set them off and produce low-level
inflammation in the brain.”
Ordinarily the microglia are in a resting state (M0),
quietly surveying the environment in the brain. When an
infectious agent invades the body, the microglia rapidly
transition to an activated state (M1) to neutralize the
threat by producing pro-inflammatory cytokines, excitatory
chemicals, and neurotoxic factors. All of these substances
interact with the neurons to contribute to flu-like
symptoms, such as pain, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction,
and sleep disturbances.
While fibro can feel like the flu (aches and pains,
fatigue, and trouble thinking and remembering things), the
process of microglia morphing into an activated state
during an infection occurs in everyone. In fact, once the
threat is resolved, these cells go back to their resting
state and all flu-like feelings disappear in healthy
people. But what if there is something else going on in
fibromyalgia patients to keep more of their microglia in
an active, pro-inflammatory state?
If the microglia are already sensitized, they could easily
become activated by small daily triggers that would
normally go unnoticed. Persistently active microglia could
overwhelm the energy demands of the brain, causing
metabolites to stockpile and lead to the chronic symptoms
of fibromyalgia. It may also explain why infections make
fibro worse and the recovery time is prolonged. But the
how’s and why’s for these events remain unknown.
What could be sensitizing the microglia in people with
fibro so that these cells become “stuck” in an activated
state? Perhaps more important, how can it be shown that a
very mild infection causes these brain cells to go in
overdrive while it doesn’t trigger a response in healthy
people?
Addressing the initial issue of sensitized microglia,
Younger says, “One cause could be abnormal cross-talk
between peripheral immune cells and microglia.” In other
words, there is something in the blood that is sending
exaggerated distress alarms to the brain. Younger suspects
an appetite-regulating hormone called leptin is the likely
culprit.
Why leptin? For starters, blood levels of this hormone
correlate with body pain in otherwise healthy women. But
there is more. Leptin readily crosses from the blood into
the brain, so it can directly influence the microglia. In
addition, Younger has preliminary data to implicate this
hormone’s role specifically in people with fibromyalgia.
The diagram below illustrates how the normally “resting”
microglia might actually be in a predominantly
hypersensitive or primed state. In turn, this would lead
to an abundance of activated M1 cells.
Putting together Younger’s hypothesis,
fibromyalgia patients must have two important steps
occurring simultaneously, such that they feed off one
another:
1. A substance in the blood, perhaps leptin,
communicates with the microglia to keep them sensitized
and ready to charge into action.
2. An exaggerated immune and inflammatory response in
the brain, as reflected by increased metabolites, occurs
any time patients are exposed to a mild pathogen ...
something that would not trigger a response in healthy
people.
Younger will use a three-part protocol to demonstrate that
the above two processes are taking place in fibromyalgia
patients but not healthy controls. First, metabolites are
measured. Second, the study participants are injected with
an immune challenge. Third, metabolites are measured
again. Symptoms and blood levels of leptin, as well as
other candidates, will also be analyzed.
The first step involves using magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS) imaging of the brain. MRS scans can
measure levels of various metabolic end products. Normally
these chemicals are whisked away by the blood. However,
metabolites can accumulate if the brain’s processes are
ramped up, as would be expected with increased microglia
activation. The temperature throughout the brain will also
be measured because activated microglia burn more energy
and generate more heat.
Younger has performed this initial metabolite detection
step in a group of 15 chronic fatigue syndrome patients,
but only two of them met the widespread pain criteria for
fibromyalgia. Given that the symptoms of these two patient
groups greatly overlap, it’s important to note that
Younger found brain areas of elevated metabolites and
increased temperature.
For the current project, the MRS data collected in the
study’s first step should be viewed as a baseline measure
for the 15 fibromyalgia patients and 15 healthy controls.
Why? Subjects are excluded if they have recently undergone
a trigger known to make fibro symptoms worse. These
include a viral or bacterial infection, a surgery or a
vaccination. In fact, participants cannot even be taking
an anti-inflammatory medication for a pulled muscle or
headache. In addition, multiple tests must confirm that
the immune system in the blood is just quietly humming
along and not fending off infections.
In the second step of the study, all subjects are injected
with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to produce a mild immune
stimulus. Bacterial cell walls contain LPS, so when it is
injected into subjects, it can trigger an immune response.
Of course, it’s just a short-lived trick to activate the
immune system because no bacteria are actually present.
One can’t simply grind up bacteria and inject this
concoction into study subjects. Safety measures are in
place to prevent causing a “live” infection. Researchers
must obtain purified LPS from the National Institutes of
Health after they have received FDA approval for its use
in their study.
The goal of this second phase of the project is to use a
mild strength of LPS that would not be expected to cause a
measurable immune response (or any symptoms) in healthy
people. To achieve this, Younger will be significantly
diluting the LPS dose. If his hypothesis that the
microglia in fibromyalgia patients are already
hypersensitized (or primed), the microglia should respond
by going “off the rails.”
The third step of this project involves putting all study
participants back into the MRS scanner two hours after
they have been injected with LPS. Metabolite levels and
temperatures throughout the brain will be measured again.
Compared to the first scan, everything should look a lot
worse after the LPS injection in the patient group, but
not in the healthy controls. Leptin, and perhaps other
substances in the blood, should also respond in an
exaggerated fashion in the patients, but there should be
no change in the healthy subjects.
Preliminary evidence by Younger shows that leptin
production is highly abnormal in fibro individuals
compared to healthy people. Are there other substances
that might respond errantly to an LPS challenge in fibro?
What about changes in the brain? Does the LPS exaggerate
the metabolite levels or temperature hot spots? Are there
specific regions in the brain that are more affected by
the LPS? Given that MRS scans are expensive, are there any
indicators in the blood that might reflect what is
happening in the brain? These are all questions that
Younger hopes to address.
“The detection of abnormal reactivity in the fibromyalgia
brain would be a substantial step forward, opening up new
avenues for diagnostics and treatments,” says Younger. But
exactly how would this work? By combining the three step
protocol, he adds: “We will for the first time be able to
trigger an abnormal brain immune response and monitor it.
This model will also be useful to test new fibromyalgia
treatments, in order to determine if they reduce the
brain’s immune hyperactive response.”